Session
Autopsy of a Fabric migration: what the capacity bill said six months later
The migration was delivered on time. The architecture diagram was sound. Six months later the capacity bill had grown 40% and a third of the workspaces had no active users. This is the post-mortem, anonymised and with numbers.
We reconstruct the timeline of a real Fabric adoption: which decisions drove capacity consumption and which ones nobody linked to cost until the invoice arrived; how workspace and domain design quietly became sprawl without anyone deciding it; which artefacts were abandoned and why; and what the usage telemetry showed against what the steering committee had been told. Along the way, the instrumentation that would have surfaced each problem months earlier — CU metrics, lineage, ownership, activity — and the four decisions that, taken differently, would have changed the outcome.
This isn't a design session. It's what happened when the design met the organisation.
Antonio José Soto Rodriguez
MVP Azure AI & Microsoft Fabric
A Coruña, Spain
Links
Please note that Sessionize is not responsible for the accuracy or validity of the data provided by speakers. If you suspect this profile to be fake or spam, please let us know.
Jump to top