Session
Trust, but Verify. Why AI Exposed a Missing Trust Layer in Digital Assets
“Trust, but verify” has long been a foundational principle in security, compliance, and everyday life. That principle assumes one thing. Verification exists.
In the past year, AI has quietly broken that assumption.
Across payments, reimbursements, marketplaces, and content platforms, organizations are encountering fraud and misuse that does not look suspicious, sloppy, or obviously fake. Documents look legitimate. Images appear authentic. Records pass basic review. The problem is no longer detection. The problem is that the artifacts themselves cannot be reliably verified.
This session explores how AI did not create fraud; it accelerated it by removing friction and scaling limits faster than verification methods could adapt. Drawing on real-world examples from reimbursement, marketplaces, and workforce documentation, the talk examines why traditional trust models are failing and why “looking real” is no longer sufficient.
Using plain language and practical examples, this presentation introduces the idea of a missing trust layer for digital assets. Similar to how SSL transformed trust on the early internet, modern digital assets now require a way to prove origin, integrity, and accountability that travels with the asset itself.
This is a conceptual, system-level discussion intended for developers, architects, and technologists who want to think beyond AI generation and focus on the long-term implications of trust, verification, and authenticity in an AI-first world.
Christopher Bulin
Express Employment Professionals, Staffing Consultant | Payments & Compliance Professional
Links
Please note that Sessionize is not responsible for the accuracy or validity of the data provided by speakers. If you suspect this profile to be fake or spam, please let us know.
Jump to top