Your school has deployed an AI tutor, a proctoring tool, or a wellbeing chatbot. A parent asks what the system said to their child, and why. Can you answer? Most schools cannot, and most contracts with their vendors do not require the vendor to answer either.
I have served as a court-appointed expert and Special Master in hundreds of federal and state proceedings, including In Re: Facebook, and I co-created the JAMS AI Dispute Resolution Rules, the first arbitration framework built for AI disputes. Increasingly the systems I am asked to examine are sitting in schools, and they are handling children's data.
This session is for leaders who sign the contract, not for engineers. We look at what schools are actually agreeing to when they procure AI, where the liability sits when an AI tool makes a consequential judgment about a student, what records a school needs to keep and for how long, and which questions to put to a vendor before signing rather than after a complaint arrives.
No legal or technical background assumed. You leave with a procurement question set you can use on your next AI vendor call, and a clear view of where your school is exposed today.