Session
Your AI Agent Is a Liability. Prove Me Wrong.
Everyone is building AI agents. Fewer people are asking whether they should. In this session I make the case that autonomous agents are a default architectural mistake: they increase fragility, destroy debuggability, and make failures harder to reason about than the deterministic systems they replace.
I am not anti-agent. I am anti-cargo-cult.
Drawing on a concrete decision framework, I will show you exactly where agents earn their complexity and where they do not. We will work through the operational line between a chatbot and a true agent, three diagnostic questions every team should answer before building, and real examples of where agents fail catastrophically in production.
You will leave with a strong default bias toward simpler architectures, and a clear, defensible test for when breaking that default is actually justified.
Leif Larsen
Software architect & tech lead | AI, architecture and the pace of work | ex-Microsoft
Oslo, Norway
Links
Please note that Sessionize is not responsible for the accuracy or validity of the data provided by speakers. If you suspect this profile to be fake or spam, please let us know.
Jump to top