New regulations and threats push organizations to regularly evaluate and effectively integrate prevention, detection, response, and recovery capabilities. These evolving threats require a multi-disciplinary approach to deploy limited resources, but how do you identify these threats? One effective solution is to leverage a fit-for-purpose impact and risk assessment designed to front-end multiple operational risk domains to enhance the identification of critical processes and products.

Organizations want the ability to implement a quantitative approach to risk analysis but often require specialized training, consultants, and resources that are outside of their budget, pushing them to stick with a qualitative approach. What would you say if I showed you another possibility to align more strategically on the convergence of the various risk disciplines? A modified hybrid approach that lies somewhere between the conventional BIA and RA but also aligns with aspects of FAIR, NIST, and ISO standards - would you be interested?