Session

Human-Agent Communication Challenges

AI agents are graduating from answering questions to taking actions — booking trips, editing files, calling APIs, submitting forms. That shift creates a new failure class: not wrong answers, but wrong actions. A small gap between what the user meant and what the agent assumed can have real-world consequences. Malicious content on a webpage can hijack the agent entirely.
This session translates Human-Agent Communication research into a four-question checklist any team can apply today: Can-do (capabilities and limits), Plan (what it intends to do), Doing (what it's changing right now), Done (what happened, with proof). We'll map concrete patterns to each stage — capability declarations, pre-commit diffs, scoped permissions, evidence receipts — and show how they reduce both accidental and adversarial failures.

By the end, attendees will be able to::

- Identify communication gaps that cause unwanted agent actions
- Recognize and defend against prompt injection in agentic pipelines
- Apply the Can-do / Plan / Doing / Done framework to agent UX design
- Implement scoped permission and approval patterns
- Evaluate trust trade-offs when deploying action-taking agents

Ron Dagdag

Microsoft AI MVP and Research Engineering Manager @ Thomson Reuters

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Actions

Please note that Sessionize is not responsible for the accuracy or validity of the data provided by speakers. If you suspect this profile to be fake or spam, please let us know.

Jump to top