Session
The wrong reasons to build an MCP server
We’ve built multiple MCP servers—enough to know where they shine, and where they hurt. MCP is powerful: it standardizes how LLMs connect with tools, prompts, and resources. But here’s the hard truth: not every use case deserves an MCP server. Sometimes it’s just overhead, slowing you down when a plain SDK or direct API call would have worked better.
In this workshop, we’ll share lessons learned from real MCP builds: the wins, the painful over-engineering, and the “wish we hadn’t done that” moments. You’ll see common anti-patterns like wrapping trivial APIs, using MCP as a database proxy, or introducing it in environments where latency and lifecycle management become a nightmare.
Most importantly, we’ll give you a practical checklist to decide when MCP is worth it—and when it’s simply the wrong tool. You’ll walk away with clear guidance, battle-tested stories, and the confidence to avoid the mistakes we made.
Contents of the workshop:
Part 1: The API Trap
Part 2: The Right-Sized Use Case
Part 3: Choose your game: Chatbot, MCP, Agent
Part 4: Decision Framework in Action
Learning Benefits and Takeaways:
- Not every integration needs an MCP server—sometimes it’s just overhead.
- Learn to spot common anti-patterns (wrapping trivial APIs, database proxies, FOMO-driven builds).
- A decision checklist to evaluate MCP vs. simpler options.
- Understand when MCP adds real value: interoperability, tool ecosystems, complex workflows.
- Lessons learned from real-world MCP implementations—what worked, what didn’t.
Please note that Sessionize is not responsible for the accuracy or validity of the data provided by speakers. If you suspect this profile to be fake or spam, please let us know.
Jump to top