Session

Design the Loop: Where Human Judgment Belongs in AI Workflows

A status update sounds low risk until leaders use it to decide what needs help, what can wait, and whether delivery is on track. When an agent compresses ten pages into five bullets, it is also deciding which uncertainty disappears. Human judgment has moved, even if the workflow still labels the output a draft.

This session follows one weekly status update from source material to the message leaders act on, watching what survives each handoff and what quietly falls away. We ask what the system can verify, what still requires judgment, and what happens when the reviewer never responds. The answers show where a human gate protects a real decision, when an agent should expose evidence before offering a conclusion, and how today's shortcut becomes tomorrow's process debt. If you lead a team or add AI to everyday work, you'll leave with a workflow map you can reuse the same week to decide where human judgment belongs.

Steve Green

Director, Slalom

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Actions

Please note that Sessionize is not responsible for the accuracy or validity of the data provided by speakers. If you suspect this profile to be fake or spam, please let us know.

Jump to top